விஜய் டிவியின் சூப்பர் சிங்கர்ஸ் 3 இல் நடக்கும் பித்தலாட்டம்.ரசிகர்கள் உலக அளவில் கண்டனம்.
விஜய் டிவி இவ்வளவு தரம் தாழ்ந்து போட்டியாளர்களை பணத்திற்கோ வேறு எதோ காரணத்துக்காகவோ பொருத்தமில்லாத பாடகர்களை தெரிவு செய்கிறார்கள். சாய் சரண் மாளவிகா போன்ற உன்னத பாடகர்களை எலிமினேட் செய்துவிட்டு பூஜாவுக்கு பாராட்டோ பாராட்டோ அடுத்தது சத்யப்ரகாஷ் இந்த இருவரையும் உன்னிக்ரிஷ்ணன் ஸ்ரீகாந்த் போன்ற நீதிபதிகள் தெரிவுசெய்வதற்கு ஒரே ஒரு காரணம்தான் இருக்க முடியும் அதாவது உன்னிக்கும் ஸ்ரீகாந்துக்கும் சாய்சரண்,மாளவிகா போன்றோர்மீது பொறாமை. இளம் பாடகர்களான இருவரும் தங்களை விட சிறந்தவர்கள் என்ற உண்மையை தாங்கமுடியாத பொறாமை. இந்த கருத்தை ரசிகர்கள் எல்லோருமே கூறுகிறார்கள்.Very Unfair the way Sai Charan got eliminated for Top 2, Puja is not a versatile singer and Sathya Prakash is ok, but he sings all songs with Karnatic accent, Sai Charan is the best. He sings verity of songs and very capable of singing any chalanging songs. I wish him all the best.
Posted by Shanti on 01 Sep 2011 04:00 AM
I think Mr. Unni likes Pooja and Srinivasan likes Satya. The final three contested foour events and Sai own two. The final event Sai own and Pooja did well. Satya should be third but the judges came up with .5 score. That is real stupid on the judges part. I hate the judges. All the judges are one dimensional not wualified to judge the talented singers.
Posted by Kevin on 01My name is Saroja Thanabalasingam and I am from Canada. For a year, I have been a religious viewer of your show, Super Singer. I am writing this as I watch your semi-final episode. Recently, my family is starting to strongly feel that the show is running on a biased term. We can’t help but notice how the judges seem to overly favour the contestant Pooja. It seems as the marks awarded to her do not reflect the judges’ comments. Let’s take the semi-final episode as an example since it is the one that is fresh in my mind. During each of the rounds the judges seemed to note that while Pooja did a ‘good’ job, there were still many aspects and specifications on which she could improve on. However, when the time came to announce marks, Pooja received great marks. We noticed that when Satya Prakash and Sai Charan were performing, the judges noted that both contests had few flaws but still awarded them with low marks. To the viewers it seems as if the judges enjoy showering Pooja with marks. It really makes us question the integrity and reliability of this program. We wonder if the competition is ‘rigged’. And trust me, we are not the only one who feel this way; on many sites, I have encountered many furious viewers who have been blasting very detailed comments about the bias in your show. I’m not writing this letter to accuse your show of being conducted in an ill-manner; I am writing this letter to let you aware of what the viewers think of your judging methods. Please take this into consideration. If you disregard this letter; take my word for it; you will regret it. By the way, please teach your hostess Divya how to not reveal her personal bias when anchoring. Honestly, it is truly irritating.
Posted by SarojaI've been watching Super Singer 3 from the beginning. Great singers by budding artists. However, one thing you cannot miss here is how the judges are extremely biased. They has been discrimination all along, and promotion of certain favorites. I definitely thought that Pooja would go to the finals, based on favoritism, inspite of the fact that there were others who were better than her. Saicharan's elimination, giving some unworthy reasons confirmed what I believed in. Great singers, but unfair judges who have made their mind beforehand. I watch the program only to watch the amazing talent, knowing very well that the judgement is biased and skewed
கருத்துகள் இல்லை:
கருத்துரையிடுக